Predicting the properties of binary stellar systems: the evolution of accreting protobinary systems

By Matthew R. Bate. 2000

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the formation of binary stellar systems. We consider a model where a ‘seed’ protobinary system forms, via fragmentation, within a collapsing molecular cloud core and evolves to its final mass by accreting material from an infalling gaseous envelope. This accretion alters the mass ratio and orbit of the binary, and is largely responsible for forming the circumstellar and/or circumbinary discs. Given this model for binary formation, we predict the properties of binary systems and how they depend on the initial conditions within the molecular cloud core. We predict that there should be a continuous trend such that closer binaries are more likely to have equal-mass components and are more likely to have circumbinary discs than wider systems. Comparing our results with observations, we find that the observed mass-ratio distributions of binaries and the frequency of circumbinary discs as a function of separation are most easily reproduced if the progenitor molecular cloud cores have radial density profiles between uniform and 1/r (e.g., Gaussian) with near-uniform rotation. This is in good agreement with the observed properties of pre-stellar cores. Conversely, we find that the observed properties of binaries cannot be reproduced if the cloud cores are in solid-body rotation and have initial density profiles which are strongly centrally condensed. Finally, in agreement with the radial-velocity searches for extrasolar planets, we find that it is very difficult to form a brown dwarf companion to a solar-type star with a separation ≲10 au, but that the frequency of brown dwarf companions should increase with larger separations or lower mass primaries.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a8f08c5fa48f5c6506eafe6b61da81e6828c677

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Matthew R. Bate
  2. Ralf Klessen
  3. L. Hillenbrand
  4. Christoph Federrath
  5. K. Luhman
  6. Robi Banerjee
  7. A. Kraus
  8. M. Mac Low

In Spectroscopy

  1. C. Clarke
  2. Ian A. Bonnell
  3. Ralf Klessen
  4. B. Reipurth
  5. Matthew R. Bate
  6. A. Kraus
  7. M. Mac Low
  8. K. Kratter

Citations in the corpus