EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON PATCH USE BY BUTTERFLIES AND SKIPPERS (LEPIDOPTERA)

By K. Summerville, T. O. Crist. 2001

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a84b3a13eb125f4cfedd5fddfdd5b7cd1bd2e2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. T. O. Crist
2. K. Summerville
3. H. Van Dyck
4. J. Veech
5. Ignasi Bartomeus
6. R. Dennis
7. R. Winfree
8. R. Pardini

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. T. O. Crist
2. K. Summerville
3. J. Veech
4. Jon C. Gering
5. R. Pardini
6. R. Dennis
7. H. Van Dyck
8. R. Winfree

In Plant Science

1. R. Pardini
2. K. Summerville
3. T. O. Crist
4. H. Van Dyck
5. Ignasi Bartomeus
6. T. Shreeve
7. Raphael K. Didham
8. Peter J. Clark

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape (2004, background): “Simulations (Fahrig 2001; Summerville and Crist 2001 ) and some empirical results (Villard et al. 1999) have also shownthat lan dscape thresholds are greatly influenced by species vagility and matrix permeability.”
• Sex and sociality in a disconnected world: A review of the impacts of habitat fragmentation on animal social interactions (2007, background): “The majority of fragmentation research has focused on patterns of species richness and abundance in fragmented habitat, as well as associations between these patterns and landscape variables (Andren 1994; Dunstan and Fox 1996; Laurance 1997; Lindenmayer et al. 1999; Debinski and Holt 2000; Summervil”
• Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes (2004, background): “reduces the magnitude of decline in butterfly diversity following fragmentation of old field habitat ( Summerville and Crist 2001 ).”
• Habitats and Resources: The Need for a Resource-based Definition to Conserve Butterflies (2006, background): “Field experimentation is rare, particularly large-scale field experimentation, and is more typical of regions where funds are available to support it (e.g., USA, Summerville and Crist 2001 ).”
• Effects of urbanization on butterfly species richness, guild structure, and rarity (2007, background): “Summerville and Crist (2001) experimentally manipulated the degree of habitat fragmentation and found that butterfly species richness was positively correlated with increasing patch area.”
• Accounting for the causal basis of collinearity when measuring the effects of habitat loss versus habitat fragmentation (2016, background): “…of bird and lizard communities, 197 patch visitation rates of butterflies, and demographic parameters of a simulated mustelid 198 population (Summerville and Crist 2001, Imbeau and Desrochers 2002, Cushman and McGarigal 199 2003, Lindenmayer et al. 2005, Jager et al. 2006, Swift and Hannon…”
• Native Pollinators in Anthropogenic Habitats (2011, background): “Floral resources can be a limiting factor for populations of bees (Roulston & Goodell 2011), Lepidoptera (Ockinger & Smith 2006, Summerville & Crist 2001), syrphid flies (Kleijn & van Langevelde 2006, Meyer et al. 2009), birds (Lara 2006), and bats (Tschapka 2004).”
• The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea (2002, background): “Today, many ecologists continue to use the two terms synonymously (Harrison et al. 1992, Blackburn and Gaston 1996, Mourelle and Ezcurra 1997, Sweeney and Cook 2001, Summerville and Crist 2001, and many others); see Vellend (2001) for a convincing argument against this practice.”