Multiple zeta values of fixed weight, depth, and height

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On relations for the multiple q-zeta values (2007, unknown): “By expanding the right hand side of (5) with the q-stuffle rule (6), choosing the part of weight 6, and dividing both sides by z− xy, we obtain the coefficients as follows: x4 :0 = 0, y4 :ζ[2, 1, 1, 1, 1] = ζ[5], x3y :ζ[5, 1] = ζ[6]− ζ[4, 2]− ζ[3, 3]− ζ[2, 4], xy3 :ζ[3, 1, 1, 1] = ζ[6]− ζ[4, 2]− ζ[3”
The Multiple Zeta Value data mine (2009, methodology): “Further theorems are theL –Murakami Theorem, [75], theOhno Theorem, [76], which generalizes the sum- and duality theorem, the Ohno–Zagier Theorem, [77], which covers the Le–Murakami theorem and the sum theorem, and generalizes a theorem by Hoffman [39,40], and thecyclic sum theorem, [78].”
Relations of multiple zeta values and their algebraic expression (2000, background): “Many other identities have been conjectured and proved in the last decade [2,3,15,17, 18 ], but surprising new ones continue to appear.”
Evaluation of the multiple zeta values $\zeta(2,\dots,2,3,2,\dots,2)$ (2012, background): “We observe that both (5) and (23) (for H(a, b)) are special cases of the main result of [9], which gave an explicit formula in terms of a generating function of the numbers G0(k, n, s) defined as the sum of all MZV’s of weight (= sum of the arguments) k, depth (= number of arguments) n and height (=”