Life cycle assessment of cricket farming in north-eastern Thailand

By A. Halloran, Y. Hanboonsong, N. Roos, S. Bruun. 2017

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Marketing, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a4bfb6198a2268c5c95430078c8456d8bf1eaf4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. D. Oonincx
2. A. van Huis
3. J. V. van Loon
4. Matan Shelomi
5. M. Dicke
6. J. Ball
7. V. Varelas
8. K. Barragán-Fonseca

In Social Psychology

1. D. Oonincx
2. A. van Huis
3. J. V. van Loon
4. M. Dicke
5. K. Barragán-Fonseca

Citations in the corpus

• The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review (2017, background): “To date, LCAs have only been published for mealworms, house crickets, black soldier flies, and houseflies (Oonincx and de Boer 2012; Miglietta et al. 2015; Roffeis et al. 2015; Van Zanten et al. 2015; Smetana et al. 2016, Halloran et al. 2017).”
• Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed (2017, background): “A life-cycle assessment of a commercial cricket farm in Thailand found that cricket production had a smaller environmental footprint than did broiler chicken farms and that the largest footprint hot spots were in relation to grain feed production for both systems (Halloran et al. 2017).”