SSR Variation in Important U.S. Maize Inbred Lines

By J. Gethi, J. Labate, K. Lamkey, Margaret E. Smith, Stephen Kresovich. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a3755777644f108eb476a03cb8bd229110bf210

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Genetic Diversity among CIMMYT Maize Inbred Lines Investigated with SSR Markers: II. Subtropical, Tropical Midaltitude, and Highland Maize Inbred Lines and their Relationships with Elite U.S. and European Maize (2005, background): “This In a cluster analysis of CIMMYT lines, the subtropicalis low and what is often found for highly inbred lines lines did not clearly cluster according to their origins or(for example, Gethi et al., 2002).”
Molecular Characterization of Maize Inbreds with Expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection (2008, background): “Most of the variation between duplicate B73 and Mo17 samples is attributed to variation between diff erent seed sources of the same inbred, a phenomenon documented by Gethi et al. (2002). To a lesser degree, variation between B73 and Mo17 samples with the same seed source is attributed to marker-sco”
Evolution of North American Dent Corn from Public to Proprietary Germplasm (2006, background): “A similar grouping consists of Reid Yellow Dent (includes BSSS), Lancaster, and miscellaneous heterotic groups ( Gethi et al., 2002 ).”
Molecular and Historical Aspects of Corn Belt Dent Diversity (2003, background): “…line within a given source has been found to Mean coefficients of inbreeding and F IS estimates sug-be (cid:2) 5%, and between sources (cid:2) 8% (Gethi et al., 2002). gest that the accessions were slightly more homozygous Molecular markers must be highly polymorphic for than if they were…”
Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield (2007, background): “, 1990), and has resulted in somewhere between two and seven distinct heterotic patterns being described (Smith and Smith, 1989; Troyer, 1999; Lu and Bernardo, 2001; Gethi et al., 2002; Mikel and Dudley, 2006).”
Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data (2006, background): “Such markers have a number of advantages when compared to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers (Pejic et al., 1998; Senior et al., 1998; Gethi et al., 2002).”