From Local Patterns to Global Models: The LeGo Approach to Data Mining
By Arno J. Knobbe, Bruno Crémilleux, Johannes Fürnkranz, Martin Scholz. 2008
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dmitry M. Malioutov
- Kush R. Varshney
- Cynthia Rudin
- Octavio Loyola-González
- Guolong Su
- Dennis Wei
- Raúl Monroy
- Siegfried Nijssen
Citations in the corpus
- Interpretable Two-level Boolean Rule Learning for Classification (2015, neutral): “Keywords Interpretable Classifier, Linear Programming Relaxation”
- Learning sparse two-level boolean rules (2016, methodology): “OOAx is similar to the multi-phase strategy [13] in using heuristic approaches to discover and select clauses before an optimization formulation is used to build a DNF with the selected clauses.”
- Contrast Pattern-Based Classification for Bot Detection on Twitter (2019, methodology): “For building a contrast pattern-based classifier, there are three phases:Mining, Filtering, and Classification [23], [47].”
- Optimal constraint-based decision tree induction from itemset lattices (2010, methodology): “Well-known algorithms include CBA (Liu et al. 1998), CMAR (Li et al. 2001) and CAEP (Dong et al. 1999); more general overviews can be found in (Knobbe et al. 2008; Bringmann et al. 2009).”
- ENDER: a statistical framework for boosting decision rules (2010, background): “Induction of decision rules can be seen as an instance of the LeGo approach (Knobbe et al. 2008), a paradigm which relies on building global models by using local patterns.”