A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country

By F. Danielsen, D. Balete, M. Poulsen, C. M. Nozawa, Arne E. Jensen. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79f6361cda64b3cbb5afae412ce8ca693c7e9810

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Milner‐Gulland
2. L. Coad

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Mikkel Hooge Holck
2. E. Milner‐Gulland
3. J. Lund
4. L. Coad
5. V. G. Vyamana

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Mikkel Hooge Holck
2. E. Milner‐Gulland
3. V. G. Vyamana

Citations in the corpus

• Community-based Monitoring of Natural Resource Use and Forest Quality in Montane Forests and Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania (2005, methodology): “Existing systems for managing the forest and monitoring natural resource use were discussed in relation to participatory monitoring methods developed elsewhere (Danielsen et al. 2000; Ling 2000; see also Poulsen and Luanglath 2005 (this issue)).”
• Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost–effective methods (2008, background): “However, taxonomical identiWcation relies on educated taxonomists who are often expensive, which can cause a monitoring scheme to collapse when donor funds cease (Dinesen 1998; Getz et al. 1999; Danielsen et al. 2000; Margules and Pressey 2000; Sheil 2001; Danielsen et al. 2003).”
• Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation (2009, background): “The use of local ecological knowledge for assessment of system state and dynamics is becoming more common (van der Hoeven et al. 2004; Danielsen et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2008).”