Exploring Monaural Features for Classification-Based Speech Segregation
By Yuxuan Wang, Kun Han, Deliang Wang. 2013
219 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Deliang Wang
- John R. Hershey
- Jonathan Le Roux
- Shinji Watanabe
- Yuxuan Wang
- Chin-Hui Lee
- Arun Narayanan
- Donald S. Williamson
In Signal Processing
- Deliang Wang
- John R. Hershey
- Jonathan Le Roux
- Shinji Watanabe
- Zhuo Chen
- Jinyu Li
- Yi Luo
- Nima Mesgarani
Citations in the corpus
- Time-Frequency Masking in the Complex Domain for Speech Dereverberation and Denoising (2017, neutral): “A complementary set of features is computed from the given signal [37].”
- Binaural Classification for Reverberant Speech Segregation Using Deep Neural Networks (2014, methodology): “GFCC has been shown to be a good single feature in a recent evaluation [39].”
- An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. (2013, background): “Although each of these three feature types can be used to discriminate speech from noise to some degree, the use of all three adds discriminative power (Wang et al., 2013).”
- Towards Scaling Up Classification-Based Speech Separation (2013, methodology): “In [46], we have also identified a set of T-F unit-level complementary features that performs very well in matched test conditions.”
- On Training Targets for Supervised Speech Separation (2014, methodology): “To focus our study on learning targets, we use a fi xed set of complementary features [34] throughout the experiments.”
- Deep clustering: Discriminative embeddings for segmentation and separation (2015, methodology): “The segmentation problem is then solved by segmenting elements into groups or partitions, for example by assigning a group label to each element.”
- Complex Ratio Masking for Monaural Speech Separation (2015, background): “A combination of these features has been shown to be effective for speech segregation [16].”
- Cocktail Party Processing via Structured Prediction (2012, background): “Wang et al. [12] propose a set of complementary acoustic features that shows further improvements over previous systems.”
- Ideal ratio mask estimation using deep neural networks for robust speech recognition (2013, unknown): “We use this group of features as it has been found to work well for IBM estimation [20].”
- Investigation of Speech Separation as a Front-End for Noise Robust Speech Recognition (2014, methodology): “We perform T-F masking in the mel-frequency domain unlike some of the recent systems that operate in the gammatone feature domain [17], [42].”
- Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overview (2017, unknown): “589 A subsequent study [177] explores more monaural features in- 590 cluding mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC), gamma- 591 tone frequency cepstral coefficient (GFCC) [150], perceptual 592 linear prediction (PLP) [67], and relative spectral transform 593 PLP (RASTA- PLP) [68].”
- Speech dereverberation and denoising using complex ratio masks (2017, background): “A complementary feature set is computed from the reverberant (and noisy) signal [18].”
- Multi-objective learning and mask-based post-processing for deep neural network based speech enhancement (2017, background): “However the motivation of our work is multi-objective learning with a novel architecture in both input and output layers, which is totally different from the motivation of feature fusion in [33].”
- Deep Belief Networks Based Voice Activity Detection (2013, background): “Hence, in real-world applications, researchers still prefer shallow models that are usually easily trained, such as SVM [10], [13], [14], [19], MK-SVM [16], single-hidden-layer-based multilayer perceptron [39], [40], group lasso [41], or Gaussian mixture model [42], [43].”