DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots

By R. Lahaye, M. VAN DER BANK, D. Bogarín, Jorge Warner, F. Pupulin, G. Gigot, O. Maurin, S. Duthoit, T. Barraclough, V. Savolainen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008

922 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79ed3940568cd4275b548c464858a78edc9527a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well (2008, methodology): “We apply a distinct approach to evaluating species resolution here, by assessing whether clusters of populations that correspond to monophyletic species in a floristic sample are well supported (see [11] for a somewhat similar approach).”
Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species (2010, methodology): “In previous studies, most researchers accepted psbA-trnH as a potential plant barcode [9,15,16,18,19,21,33].”
Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode (2011, background): “[8] proposed that matK alone should constitute the plant barcode.”
The integrative future of taxonomy (2010, background): “Conclusions and future perspectives for an integrative taxonomy The past years have seen an important reduction of taxonomic impediments: conflicts about species concepts are being replaced by a consensus on the view of species as lineages [see [25]]; the access to crucial taxonomic information is f”
A DNA barcode for land plants (2009, background): “The unique identification to species level in 72% of cases and to ‘species groups’ in the remainder will be useful for many applications of DNA barcoding such as studies of plant-animal interactions (15), establishing whether plant products in international trade belong to protected species (9, 16, ”
New universal matK primers for DNA barcoding angiosperms (2011, background): “…high evolutionary rate of matK has made it usable in phylogenetic reconstructions at high taxonomic levels, such as Order or Family, and sometimes also at low taxonomic levels, such as Genus or Species (Wolfe, 1991; Hilu et al., 2003; Müller et al., 2006; Chase et al., 2007; Lahaye et al., 2008).”
Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL+matK DNA barcode (2011, background): “2010) and mesoamerican and South African biodiversity hotspots (Lahaye et al. 2008).”
Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants (2011, result): “, Orchidaceae), as suggested by previous studies (22) and confirmed by the present study, but do not perform well in other groups such as Poales, Laurales, Dioscoreales, Apiales, and Zygophyllales (Fig.”
Use of ITS2 Region as the Universal DNA Barcode for Plants and Animals (2010, positive): “In contrast, intra-specific variation was evaluated by three additional parameters: average intra-specific difference, theta (h), and average coalescent depth [27,32].”
Plant DNA barcodes: Applications today and in the future (2017, background): “…for plant DNA barcode markers (e.g., Kress et al., 2005) for the botanical community to reach some consensus on the regions that showed the highest promise of success (Lahaye et al, 2008; CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009; Chen et al., 2010; China Plant BOL Group, 2011; Hollingsworth, 2011).”
The Application of Biotechnology to Orchids (2013, background): “Lahaye et al. (2008) analysed the matK sequences of 1566 specimens of orchids representing 1084 species from Costa Rica, highlighting the relevance of this technique in species identification and in phylogenetic reconstruction.”
Species delimitation and relationships: The dance of the seven veils (2015, background): “Despite these concerted efforts, many publications indicate a suboptimal species assignment success with DNA barcodes (Gossypium L.: Ashfaq & al., 2013; Thymus L.: Federici & al., 2013; Populus L.: Feng & al., 2013; Salvia L.: Wang, M. & al., 2013; Arundinarieae: Zhang & al., 2012; Pinus L.: Hernand”