Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes.

By M. Lockwood. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010

637 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79db5c136b47efab5144a03c4240a5acc7d4a062

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. N. Bennett
2. P. Eagles
3. Nadine Marshall
4. T. Morrison
5. R. Turner
6. R. Tobin
7. J. Addison
8. Brock J. Bergseth

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. N. Bennett
2. P. Eagles
3. T. Morrison
4. R. Turner
5. R. Tobin
6. Nadine Marshall
7. J. Addison
8. Brock J. Bergseth

Citations in the corpus

• Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: the cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam (2014, background): “12 transparency and continuity in communicating these responsibilities, leading to accountability of both public and private actors (Lockwood, 2010; Dingwerth, 2007).”
• Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity: a psychometric approach (2015, background): “…have been offered in the form of principles with international reach (UNDP 1997, Kaufmann et al. 2003), requirements for effective common-property governance (Ostrom 1990), and context-specific treatments of sustainability (MSRM 2004) and protected areas (Graham et al. 2003, Lockwood 2010).”
• Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management (2016, positive): “The functioning of conservation governance can be evaluated based on indicators of norms such as participation, transparency, accountability, flexibility, collaboration, leadership, vision, and communication (Lockwood 2010; Eagles et al. 2013; Bennett & Dearden 2014 b ).”
• Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance (2016, background): “Resource users’ recognition of authorities’ commitment, efforts, and integrity in working toward their objectives can enhance earned legitimacy (Lockwood 2010).”
• Research priorities in park tourism (2014, positive): “Lockwood (2010) suggests seven principles and performance outcomes: (1) legitimacy; (2) transparency; (3) accountability; (4) inclusiveness; (5) fairness; (6) connectivity; and (7) resilience.”