Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality*

By J. Boyd, J. Forbes, T. Nakada, K. Walley, J. Russell. Critical Care Medicine, 2011

1,375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79d419aa33c50ee4a6c79aa414552ea63c251bee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

1. R. Cavallazzi
2. R. Bellomo
3. John A. Kellum
4. P. Marik

In Epidemiology

1. Claudio Ronco
2. John A. Kellum
3. Sean M. Bagshaw
4. R. Bellomo
5. R. Cavallazzi
6. P. Marik

In Surgery

1. R. Cavallazzi
2. R. Bellomo
3. Claudio Ronco
4. P. Marik
5. Sean M. Bagshaw
6. John A. Kellum

Citations in the corpus

• Does the Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness? An Updated Meta-Analysis and a Plea for Some Common Sense* (2013, background): “However, overzealous fluid resuscitation has been associated with increased comphcations, increased length of ICU and hospital stay, and increased mortality (9-13).”
• Acute kidney injury in sepsis (2017, background): “Fluid accumulation was associated with adverse outcomes and increased mortality from the Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock [57] and in the Fluids and Catheters Treatment [58] trials, and in the Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease group [59], with per”