A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics
By Anne H. Fabricius, Dominic Watt, Daniel Ezra Johnson. Language Variation and Change, 2009
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79bc5e2c72f292d5d060bb64179098f2c44fc0a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception (2008, methodology): “The Watt & Fabricius method (Fabricius et al., 2009) was designed to be quite careful about the selection of the midpoint of the talker’s vowel space by selecting a subset of vowels that will sample the extremes of the available formant space for each speaker.”
- An Empirical Study on L2 Accents of Cross-lingual Text-to-Speech Systems via Vowel Space (2022, methodology): “We apply the renowned Lobanov normalization method [28] to normalize speaker information on the vowel space, as many other linguistics researchers have proven its effectiveness [29, 30].”