Mid-Level Visual Representations Improve Generalization and Sample Efficiency for Learning Active Tasks

By Alexander Sax, Bradley Emi, Amir Zamir, Leonidas J. Guibas, Silvio Savarese, Jitendra Malik. 2018

16 citations recorded by the source corpus.

One of the ultimate promises of computer vision is to help robotic agents perform active tasks, like delivering packages or doing household chores. However, the conventional approach to solving "vision" is to define a set of offline recognition problems (e.g. object detection) and solve those first. This approach faces a challenge from the recent rise of Deep Reinforcement Learning frameworks that learn active tasks from scratch using images as input. This poses a set of fundamental questions: what is the role of computer vision if everything can be learned from scratch? Could intermediate vision tasks actually be useful for performing arbitrary downstream active tasks? We show that proper use of mid-level perception confers significant advantages over training from scratch. We implement a perception module as a set of mid-level visual representations and demonstrate that learning active tasks with mid-level features is significantly more sample-efficient than scratch and able to generalize in situations where the from-scratch approach fails. However, we show that realizing these gains requires careful selection of the particular mid-level features for each downstream task. Finally, we put forth a simple and efficient perception module based on the results of our study, which can be adopted as a rather generic perception module for active frameworks.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Ishan Misra
  2. Jitendra Malik
  3. Devi Parikh
  4. Dhruv Batra
  5. Dhruv Kumar Mahajan
  6. Priya Goyal
  7. David Held
  8. Daniel Gordon

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Trevor Darrell
  3. Jitendra Malik
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Kristen Grauman
  8. Andrew Zisserman

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Ishan Misra
  2. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  3. Jitendra Malik
  4. Dhruv Kumar Mahajan
  5. Andrea Vedaldi
  6. Priya Goyal
  7. Dhruv Batra
  8. Trevor Darrell

Citations in the corpus