Modeling Coupled Surface–Subsurface Flow Processes: A Review

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Integrated mathematical modeling of hydrological and hydrodynamic response to rainfall events in rural lowland catchments (2014, background): “…surface, and subsurface processes and endowed with different degrees of complexity, accuracy, data requirements, and levels of coupling can be found in the literature [see e.g., Morita and Yen, 2002; De Roo et al., 2003; Furman, 2008; Camporese et al., 2010; Borah, 2011; Nester et al., 2012].”
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook (2015, methodology): “Several classification schemes for integrated surface/subsurface hydrological models have been proposed, and various studies have assessed the different approaches that are used for coupling and resolution of these numerical models [Morita and Yen, 2002; Gunduz and Aral, 2005; Kampf and Burges, 2007”
Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives (2016, background): “This is required for the nontrivial issue of modeling coupled infiltration and overland flow (Furman, 2008; Chen et al., 2012; Langhans et al., 2013).”
Surface‐subsurface model intercomparison: A first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks (2014, methodology): “We can define three approaches for solving the coupled system of equations (1) and (3): asynchronous linking, sequential iteration, and globally implicit [Panday and Huyakorn, 2004; Furman, 2008; Park et al., 2009; Dagès et al., 2012].”