Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity
By M. Csete, John C. Doyle. Science, 2002
665 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79a6254ae5b5ced55c1369ad08637c303f65e4b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biophysics
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise (2002, background): “Considerations of noise and robustness offer insight into the design and function of intracellular network”
- Stochastic mechano-chemical kinetics of molecular motors: A multidisciplinary enterprise from a physicist’s perspective (2012, background): “emicalstatesand kineticscheme of a molecular motor from its observed properties is reminiscent of inferring the operational mechanism of a given functioning macroscopic motor by “reverse engineering” [78, 79]. It would be desirable to follow Platt’s [80] principle of “strong inference” [81] which is”
- Robustness of Cellular Functions (2004, neutral): “(Csete and Doyle, 2002).”
- Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems: Implications for Public Policy (2013, background): “The engineered system of a Boeing 777 which has 150,000 different subsystem modules can continue to fly when many modules have been knocked out (Csete and Doyle, 2002).”
- Explaining the Cambrian "Explosion" of Animals (2006, background): “It is easy to see why this perhaps counter-intuitive result occurs once one recognizes that an optimal solution for one need will typically compromise the ability of the organism to perform some other need, a principle well understood by engineers of complex systems (Csete & Doyle 2002).”