An eDNA approach to detect eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis) using samples of water

By Z. Olson, J. Briggler, ROD N. Williams. Wildlife research (East Melbourne), 2012

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7994353fa4375b07830c29280f8aa955312c00a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. P. F. Thomsen
2. K. Deiner
3. C. Turner
4. M. Barnes
5. H. Buckley
6. R. Griffiths
7. A. Valentini
8. Tony Dejean

In Ecology

1. C. Turner
2. P. F. Thomsen
3. M. Barnes
4. K. Deiner
5. F. Altermatt
6. Tony Dejean
7. P. Møller
8. E. E. Sigsgaard

In Molecular Biology

1. C. Turner
2. P. F. Thomsen
3. M. Barnes
4. K. Deiner
5. F. Altermatt
6. Tony Dejean
7. P. Møller
8. E. E. Sigsgaard

Citations in the corpus

• Methods for the extraction, storage, amplification and sequencing of DNA from environmental samples (2018, methodology): “Studies using Dneasy PowerWater® kits targeted DNA from fish (e.g. Jerde et al. 2013; Keskin 2014), but also amphibians (e.g. Olson et al. 2012) and an aquatic reptile (Burmese python; Hunter et al. 2015).”
• Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) (2015, background): “…the presence of amphibians, fish, invertebrates (including dragonflies and crustaceans), mammals and water birds (Ficetola et al., 2008; Goldberg et al., 2011; Olson et al., 2012; Thomsen et al., 2012), and to assess fish and amphibian abundance (Takahara et al., 2012; Pilliod et al., 2013a).”
• Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples (2015, methodology): “Finally, the eDNA method is noninvasive, an important strength in the case of freshwater fishes, where many fishing techniques carry risks of harming the study species (e.g. Snyder, 2003), but also for other freshwater taxa, such as amphibians (Olson et al., 2012).”
• Transport Distance of Invertebrate Environmental DNA in a Natural River (2014, background): “They either found no relationship [16,31] or a positive relationship [15,17,18].”
• Experimental observations on the decay of environmental DNA from bighead and silver carps (2017, background): “2013), salamanders (Goldberg et al. 2011; Olson et al. 2012), fish (Jerde et al.”
• The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics (2016, methodology): “Meanwhile, a Minnesota, USA lake study of Common Carp found similar results, with rate of detection and eDNA concentration correlating positively with fish abundance (Eichmiller et al. 2014).”