An Analysis of Working Capital Management Results Across Industries

By G. Filbeck, T. Krueger. 2005

427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/798b3f2e8c4ade129a16da5671a29f92e12efd7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Working Capital Management and Firm Profitability : Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Construction Firms Listed on Nairobi S ecurities Exchange, Kenya (2013, background): “The significance of working capital management efficiency is irrefutable (Filbeck & Krueger, 2005).”
The Relationship between Working Capital Management Efficiency and EBIT (2009, background): “There is a significant difference among industries in wc measures across time (Krueger 2002).”
The impact of cash conversion cycle on firm profitability: An empirical study based on Swedish data (2014, result): “In line with several studies (Shin and Soenen, 1998; Deloof, 2003; Filbeck and Krueger, 2005; Garcia-Teruel and Martinez-Solano, 2007; Napompech, 2012), we predict a negative relationship between CCC and profitability.”
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFICIENCY LEVEL OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS IN ISE (ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE) (2009, background): “Success of a firm mainly depends on efficient management capability of finance director to manage receivables, inventories and liabilities (Filbeck & Krueger, 2005).”
Working capital management and SMEs profitability: Portuguese evidence (2015, methodology): “…the industry effect, since firms have diverse and unique characteristics for each sector (Hawawini et al., 1986; Weinraub and Visscher, 1998; Filbeck and Krueger, 2005), the ROA, ROIC and cash conversion cycle were considered to be sectorial characteristics and so, their respective means…”