Derived splinters in positive characteristic
By B. Bhatt. Compositio Mathematica, 2011
59 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract This paper introduces the notion of a derived splinter. Roughly speaking, a scheme is a derived splinter if it splits off from the coherent cohomology of any proper cover. Over a field of characteristic 0, this condition characterises rational singularities, as suggested by the work of Kovács. Our main theorem asserts that over a field of characteristic p, derived splinters are the same as (underived) splinters, i.e. schemes that split off from any finite cover. Using this result, we answer some questions of Karen Smith concerning the extension of Serre/Kodaira-type vanishing results beyond the class of ample line bundles in positive characteristic; these are purely projective geometric statements independent of singularity considerations. In fact, we can prove ‘up to finite cover’ analogues in characteristic p of many vanishing theorems known in characteristic 0. All these results fit naturally in the study of F-singularities, and are motivated by a desire to understand the direct summand conjecture.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7984b871e45c12d25143587e4d3dd1fcb3e709a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
In Geometry and Topology
- B. Bhatt
- A. Beilinson
- Peter Scholze
- Wiesława Nizioł
- Arpon Raksit
- Ruochuan Liu
- Kiran S. Kedlaya
- Bertrand Toën
In Mathematical Physics
- B. Bhatt
- A. Beilinson
- Peter Scholze
- Wiesława Nizioł
- Arpon Raksit
- Ruochuan Liu
- Kiran S. Kedlaya
- Bertrand Toën
Citations in the corpus
- On the direct summand conjecture and its derived variant (2016, background): “section is to prove Theorem 1.2 Theorem 6.1. Let A 0 be a regular noetherian ring, and let f 0 : X 0 → Spec(A 0) be a proper surjective map. Then the map A 0 → RΓ(X 0,OX0) splits in D(A 0). Proof. By [Bh1], we may assume that A 0 does not contain a field. Assume first that A 0 is p-adically formally s”