Analyzing Attribute Dependencies
By Aleks Jakulin, Ivan Bratko. 2003
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Houtao Deng
- Huan Liu
- Kai Puolamäki
- Andreas Henelius
- Zheng Zhao
- Antti Ukkonen
- Aleks Jakulin
- George C. Runger
In Computer Science Applications
- Wray L. Buntine
- Antti Ukkonen
- Kai Puolamäki
- Andreas Henelius
- Aleks Jakulin
- Zheng Zhao
- George C. Runger
- Huan Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Interpreting Classifiers through Attribute Interactions in Datasets (2017, neutral): “Tatti (2011) ordered attributes according to their dependencies while Jakulin & Bratko (2003) quantified the degree of attribute interaction and Jakulin & Bratko (2004) factorised the joint data distribution and presented a method for significance testing of attribute interactions.”
- Testing the significance of attribute interactions (2004, background): “Jakulin and Bratko (2003) suggested that a considerably high or low interaction information among attributes is a heuristic indication that the attributes interact and should not be factorized.”
- Nomograms for visualizing support vector machines (2005, background): “This problem is referred to as a negative interaction or as attribute redundancy [13].”
- Searching for interacting features in subset selection (2009, unknown): “They further provide in [26] a justification of the interaction information, replace the notion of ‘high’ and ‘low’ in [28] with statistical significance, and illustrate the significant interactions in the form of interaction graph.”
- Applying Discrete PCA in Data Analysis (2004, methodology): “An inves- 2See http://www.ai.mit.edu/∼jrennie/20Newsgroups/. tigation into the interactions here using methods of (Jakulin & Bratko, 2003) revealed that in the hierarchical model much of the interaction is up and down the hierarchy.”
- Gene selection with guided regularized random forest (2012, background): “For example, the measures can not capture the exclusive OR relationship Y = XOR ( X 1 , X 2 ), in which neither X 1 nor X 2 is predictive individually, but X 1 and X 2 together can correctly determine Y [14].”
- Finding Statistically Significant Attribute Interactions (2016, methodology): “[ 10] proposed a method for quantifying the degree of interaction and [11] consider factorising the joint data distribution and presented a method for testing the significance of the found attribute interactions (experiments limited to two and three-way interactions).”
- Searching for Interacting Features (2007, background): “They further provide in [Jakulin and Bratko, 2004] a justification of the interaction information, and replace the notion of ‘high’ and ‘low’ in [Jakulin and Bratko, 2003] with statistical significance and illustrate the significant interactions in the form of interaction graph.”