Detached—Eddy Simulation方法模拟不同类型翼型的失速特性

By 李栋, 焦予秦, Igor, Men’shov, 中村佳朗. 2005

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

CFD Vision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences (2014, background): “Hybrid RANS/LES methods show perhaps the most promise in being able to capture more of the relevant flow physics for complex geometries at an increasingly reasonable computational cost.(68,111) From the user survey, the majority of survey participants ranked the continued development of hybrid RANS/”
Structure of turbulent flow at a river confluence with momentum and velocity ratios close to 1: Insight provided by an eddy‐resolving numerical simulation (2011, methodology): “Of particular interest is the use of hybrid Reynolds‐averaged Navier‐Stokes (RANS)–large‐eddy simulation (LES) methods like DES [Spalart, 2009] that allow simulations of field conditions while resolving the dynamically important coherent structures in the flow.”
Confinement effects in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions through wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (2014, methodology): “A second alternative is the integration of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and LES formulations into hybrid simulations, as is done in detached eddy simulations (DES) (for a review, see Spalart 2009).”
Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data (2018, background): “Among these, RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) and LES (Large Eddy Simulation) approaches are the most common, although there exist many alternatives (Girimaji 2006; Spalart 2009).”