Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi.

By Stein T. Holden, R. Lunduka. 2012

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/795e8c2552d88ba4fbd7acce06f8339163ae2737

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. N. Mason
2. T. Jayne
3. W. Burke
4. J. Ariga
5. C. Ragasa
6. M. Muyanga
7. A. Chapoto
8. Christopher B. Barrett

In Soil Science

1. N. Mason
2. T. Jayne
3. M. Muyanga

Citations in the corpus

• Review: Taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs (2018, background): “Similarly, Holden and Lunduka (2010, 2012) and Levine (2015) find that ISP fertilizer does not affect Malawian and Zambian smallholders’ use of organic manure, and Holden and Lunduka (2010) find no effect of Malawi’s ISP on crop rotation.”
• Understanding the agricultural input landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa : recent plot, household, and community-level evidence (2014, unknown): “69 Study F S P I M Sample selected Main findings Input use statistics Holden and Lunduka (2012) X Household and plot level data from 2006, 2007, 2009 of 450 households and over 3,000 plots in two districts in Central Malawi and four districts in Southern Malawi.”