A finite volume approach for contingent claims valuation
By R. Zvan, Peter A. Forsyth, Kenneth R. Vetzal. 2001
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/792deeaeb8813ecb7c2c0f716152924bc7916f66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Peter A. Forsyth
- Kenneth R. Vetzal
- S. Clift
- George Labahn
- Song‐Ping Zhu
- Yann d'Halluin
- Shijun Liao
- Jari Toivanen
Citations in the corpus
- Penalty methods for the numerical solution of American multi-asset option problems (2008, unknown): “, [11,27,6,26,4,5].”
- A closed-form analytical solution for the valuation of convertible bonds with constant dividend yield (2006, background): “Examples of numerical approaches include the finite element approach (see [1]), the finite volume approach (see [19]) and the finite difference approach (see [16]).”
- Numerical solution of two asset jump diffusion models for option valuation (2008, methodology): “[53, 54, 19] to produce a similarly quadratically convergent method.”
- A numerical PDE approach for pricing callable bonds (2001, methodology): “Note that we used the same interest rate domains as in Table 2.”
- Quadratic Convergence for Valuing American Options Using a Penalty Method (2001, methodology): “It is a topic of further research to extend the convergence results in this paper to the more general problems described in [37, 38 ].”
- Numerical convergence properties of option pricing PDEs with uncertain volatility (2003, background): “Note that a finite volume approach as in Zvan et al. (2001) would lead to the same form of discretization as equation (3.1).”