Comparative effects of drought stress on leaf anatomy of two olive cultivars
By A. Bosabalidis, G. Kofidis. 2002
341 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7929cdfd077c3bfbc4ea12744c4f2dd2d4bcf5cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Organic Chemistry
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Physiology of Adaptation and Yield Expression in Olive (2010, background): “The consequence is a small internal conductance to water vapor transport of around 0.4 mmol m-2 s-1 (Chartzoulakis et al. 1999) for ‘Mastoidis’ and ‘Koroneiki’.”
- Physiological and anatomical changes induced by drought in two olive cultivars (cv Zalmati and Chemlali) (2010, background): “level of genetic variation in gas exchange responses to water stress between olive cultivars (Chartzoulakis et al. 1999; Tognetti et al. 2002). According to Bongi and Palliotti (1994), our results confirm the great sensitivity of leaf photosynthesis to drought.”
- Photosynthetic and anatomic responses of peanut leaves to cadmium stress (2008, background): “Small but abundant stomata maximize the rate of carbon gain while minimizing water loss, which is usually considered as a xerophytic characteristic of leaves (Fahn 1964, Sundberg 1986, Bosabalidis and Kofidis 2002).”
- Influence of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and protective enzymes of potato at seedling stage (2017, background): “It has substantial influence on the growth condition, morphological structure and physiology and biochemistry of plants (Bosabalidis and Kofidis, 2002; Jill et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2008).”
- Adaptation of olive (Olea europaea L.) to water-limited environments (2005, background): “Leaves formed under water stress are more able to control transpiration, being smaller and thicker and having more dense and smaller stomata (Chartzoulakis et al. 1999; Bosabalidis and Kofidis 2002).”