OPACITIES AND SPECTRA OF THE r-PROCESS EJECTA FROM NEUTRON STAR MERGERS
By D. Kasen, N. Badnell, J. Barnes. 2013
359 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Material ejected during (or immediately following) the merger of two neutron stars may assemble into heavy elements through the r-process. The subsequent radioactive decay of the nuclei can power transient electromagnetic emission similar to, but significantly dimmer than, an ordinary supernova. Identifying such events is an important goal of future optical surveys, offering new perspectives on the origin of r-process nuclei and the astrophysical sources of gravitational waves. Predictions of the transient light curves and spectra, however, have suffered from the uncertain optical properties of heavy ions. Here we argue that the opacity of an expanding r-process material is dominated by bound–bound transitions from those ions with the most complex valence electron structure, namely the lanthanides. For a few representative ions, we run atomic structure models to calculate the radiative transition rates for tens of millions of lines. The resulting r-process opacities are orders of magnitude larger than that of ordinary (e.g., iron-rich) supernova ejecta. Radiative transport calculations using these new opacities suggest that the light curves should be longer, dimmer, and redder than previously thought. The spectra appear to be pseudo-blackbody, with broad absorption features, and peak in the infrared (∼1 μm). We discuss uncertainties in the opacities and attempt to quantify their impact on the spectral predictions. The results have important implications for observational strategies to find and study the radioactively powered electromagnetic counterparts to neutron star mergers.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/791d70f0a1e5fd78a66b7a13c554f8f73024433f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Instrumentation
- L. Hernquist
- P. Hopkins
- B. Metzger
- Risa Wechsler
- Bing Zhang
- Volker Springel
- Simon D. M. White
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
Citations in the corpus
- AT 2017gfo: An Anisotropic and Three-component Kilonova Counterpart of GW170817 (2017, background): “…elements powers a transient called “kilonova” or “macronova” (MKN, Li & Paczyński 1998; Rosswog 2005; Metzger et al. 2010; Roberts et al. 2011; Kasen et al. 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013; the term “macronova” initially refered to a transient powered by free-neutron and Nickel decay,…”
- EFFECT OF A HIGH OPACITY ON THE LIGHT CURVES OF RADIOACTIVELY POWERED TRANSIENTS FROM COMPACT OBJECT MERGERS (2013, methodology): “We use improved estimates of the atomic data of heavy elements derived from ab initio atomic structure models (Kasen et al. 2013, hereafter K13).”
- Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process (2019, background): “bound transitions (Kasen et al., 2013; Fontes et al., 2015; Tanaka et al., 2018).”
- The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models (2017, background): “L 10 10p 40 41 erg s−1 over a longer timescale of ~t 1p week (a so-called “red” KN; Barnes & Kasen 2013; Kasen et al. 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013).”
- Dynamical Mass Ejection from Binary Neutron Star Mergers (2016, background): “…of by-products of the rprocess in a macronova (sometimes also called kilonova) (e.g., Li & Paczynski 1998; Kulkarni 2005; Metzger et al. 2010; Roberts et al. 2011; Kasen et al. 2013; Barnes & Kasen 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013; Rosswog et al. 2014; Grossman et al. 2014; Lippuner & Roberts 2015).”
- Rates of compact object coalescences (2021, background): “Population III stars [12, 25] Kinugawa et al. (2014) Population III stars, StarTrack [0.”
- CONSTRAINING THE SYMMETRY PARAMETERS OF THE NUCLEAR INTERACTION (2012, background): “Gamma-ray bursts and r-process production are most likely in the case the neutron star is tidally disrupted, and radioactive decay in unbound neutron-rich ejecta could produce an isotropic optical (Roberts et al. 2011; Metzger & Berger 2012) or infrared (Kasen et al. 2013) transient.”
- Red or blue? A potential kilonova imprint of the delay until black hole formation following a neutron star merger (2014, methodology): “6, we have used κ = 10 cm2 g−1 for the equatorial material (Lanthanide dominated), and κ = 1 cm2 g−1 for the polar material (Lanthanide free), see Kasen et al. (2013).”
- The Observer's Guide to the Gamma-Ray Burst-Supernova Connection (2016, background): “However, at later epochs the SEDs are better described by thermal, black-body spectra, with peak temperatures of ∼ 2700 K, which are in good agreement with theoretical expectations [320].”
- Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants (2014, background): “Kasen et al. (2013) estimate that as little as XLa,Ac 0.01 per cent of these ‘opacity polluters’ could be enough to raise the opacities by a factor of 100.”
- The Emergence of a Lanthanide-rich Kilonova Following the Merger of Two Neutron Stars (2017, background): “…of newly synthesized heavy elements in the KN/MN ejecta, particularly lanthanides and actinides, will render them faint in the optical, with emission instead appearing primarily in the near-infrared on timescales of several days (Barnes & Kasen 2013; Kasen et al. 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013).”
- Systematic opacity calculations for kilonovae (2019, background): “2017c, ApJL, 848, L13 Andreoni, I., Ackley, K., Cooke, J., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e069 Arcavi, I., Hosseinzadeh, G., Howell, D. A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 64 Bar-Shalom, A., Klapisch, M., & Oreg, J. 2001, JQSRT, 71, 169 Barnes, J., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 18 Barnes, J., Kasen, D., Wu, M.-R., ”
- THE FORMATION OF ECCENTRIC COMPACT BINARY INSPIRALS AND THE ROLE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EMISSION IN BINARY–SINGLE STELLAR ENCOUNTERS (2013, background): “…non-eccentric binary mergers (Lattimer & Schramm 1974; Rosswog et al. 1999; Rosswog & Liebendörfer 2003; Rosswog 2005; Lee & Ramirez-Ruiz 2007; Metzger et al. 2010; Roberts et al. 2011; Bauswein et al. 2013; Kasen et al. 2013; Barnes & Kasen 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013; Grossman et al. 2013).”