Characterizations of two different fractional operators without singular kernel
By Mehmet Yavuz. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 2019
79 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this paper, we analyze the behaviours of two different fractional derivative operators defined in the last decade. One of them is defined with the normalized sinc function (NSF) and the other one is defined with the Mittag-Leffler function (MLF). Both of them have a non-singular kernel. The fractional derivative operator defined with the MLF is developed by Atangana and Baleanu (ABO) in 2016 and the other operator defined with the normalized sinc function (NSFDO) is created by Yang et al. in 2017. These mentioned operators have some advantages to model the real life problems and to solve them. On the other hand, since the Laplace transform (LT) of the ABO can be calculated more easily, it can be preferred to solve linear/nonlinear problems. In this study, we use the perturbation method with coupled the LTs of these operators to analyze their performance in solving some fractional differential equations. Furthermore, by constructing the error analysis, we test the practicability and usefulness of the method.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Simulation, Numerical Analysis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79107b035b51db5093f3e3d8cd9a4f5ea749c4e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Modeling and Simulation
- Jagdev Singh
- Mohammed Alhodaly
- Banan Maayah
- Omar Abu Arqub
- Nabil T. Shawagfeh
- Dumitru Băleanu
- M. Al‐Smadi
- Devendra Kumar
In Numerical Analysis
- Banan Maayah
- Jagdev Singh
- Mohammed Alhodaly
- Omar Abu Arqub
- Nabil T. Shawagfeh
- Dumitru Băleanu
- M. Al‐Smadi
Citations in the corpus
- Reproducing kernel approach for numerical solutions of fuzzy fractional initial value problems under the Mittag–Leffler kernel differential operator (2021, background): “So x t ð Þ 1⁄2 r in Equation (29) symbolizes the analytic solution of Equation (25).”