Dominant species can produce a negative relationship between species diversity and ecosystem function

By R. Creed, Robert P. Cherry, J. R. Pflaum, C. Wood. 2009

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/790ddd53a9d226c7bb0c1b7a60a99591dd1fc626

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. T. Buckland
2. Stuart E. Newson
3. Anne E. Magurran
4. Janine B. Illian
5. Angelika Studeny
6. D. Prati
7. N. Blüthgen
8. Valentin H. Klaus

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. T. Buckland
2. D. Prati
3. N. Blüthgen
4. Anne E. Magurran
5. Juliane Steckel
6. Stuart E. Newson
7. E. Allan
8. C. Westphal

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. T. Buckland
2. D. Prati
3. N. Blüthgen
4. Valentin H. Klaus
5. Anne E. Magurran
6. Stuart E. Newson
7. E. Allan
8. C. Westphal

Citations in the corpus

• The geometric mean of relative abundance indices : a biodiversity measure with a difference (2011, background): “Moreover, the relationship between species richness and function is complex (Tilman et al. 2006, Hector and Bagchi 2007, Creed et al. 2009, Jain et al. 2010).”
• Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition (2015, background): “Observational studies have found weakly positive (Maestre et al. 2012; Gamfeldt et al. 2013), neutral (Grace et al. 2007) or negative (Creed et al. 2009) relationships.”