International 'standards' and international governance

By Kenneth W. Abbott, D. Snidal. 2001

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/790a680568bbcdcd3a57ea7deae3bf0160e727b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression (2005, background): “…2000 for a similar argument in the European context+ 39+ For a discussion of hand tying through credible commitment, see Martin 1998 and 2000;Abbott and Snidal 2001; and Kahler and Lake 2003+ I would like to thank an anonymous reviewers for helping me to clarify this point+ ht tp s: // do…”
Agenda-setting in the European Union: a theoretical exploration and agenda for research (2007, background): “Part of this literature adopts a functionalist perspective on international cooperation (e.g. Abbott and Snidal 2001: 346ff.; Keohane 1984: 80–3; Krasner 1982: 191–2; Young 1999: 24–5).”
Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard setting in accounting (2005, unknown): “…predominantly understood as a technical and rational process driven by the worldwide spread of consensual universalistic principles and cognitive routines (Loya and Boli 1999), or as in institutional economics, by functional needs of coordination (David and Greenstein 1990; Abbott and Snidal 2001).”
Governance Frameworks for Public Project Development and Estimation (2009, background): “Authors like Detomasi (2006), Jacoby (2005), O’Sullivan (2000), and Abbott and Snidal (2001) all discuss differences in the governance systems found in different countries. There seem to be two important categories, the main difference being who are regarded as legitimate stakeholders: • Shareholder”
Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously (2006, background): “Commercial law and accounting rules are other cases in point, since their international standardization improves the efficiency of transnational operations (Abbott and Snidal, 2001: 351).”
Fiscal Transparency: Concepts, Measurement and UK Practice (2003, background): “There are international standardization projects over large areas of public policy and economic regulation ( Abbott and Snidal 2001 ).”
Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade (2016, methodology): “Furthermore, the larger institutional context from within which standards emerged and developed has only been sketched in here (cf. Abbott and Snidal 2001, 2009).”
Uneven Geographies of Organizational Practice: Explaining the Cross-National Transfer and Diffusion of ISO 9000 (2005, background): “Rather, these standards are part of a broader trend toward governance through standardization (Abbott and Snidal 2001; Sturgeon 2003).”
Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, methodology): “Abbott and Snidal (2001) and David and Shurmer (1996).”