Reaffirming the Sensory Recruitment Account of Working Memory.
By Jason M. Scimeca, Anastasia Kiyonaga, Mark D'Esposito. 2018
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Multiplexed Levels of Cognitive Control through Delta and Theta Neural Oscillations (2024, background): “…’ Esposito, 2003) and integrating such information with inputs from posterior association and sensory cortices, which maintain lower-level sensory and stimulus information (Lorenc & Sreenivasan, 2021; Scimeca, Kiyonaga, & D ’ Esposito, 2018; Sreenivasan, Curtis, & D ’ Esposito, 2014; Fuster, 2001).”
- Visual field map size constrains working memory precision (2026, unknown): “…storage has been debated (Bettencourt & Xu, 2016a; Hallenbeck et al., 2021; Iamshchinina et al., 2021; Lorenc & Sreenivasan, 2021; Rademaker et al., 2019; Scimeca et al., 2018; Teng & Postle, 2021; Xu, 2017, 2020), our findings add to the preponderance of evidence that both regions are important.”
- Fronto-medial theta coordinates posterior maintenance of working memory content (2021, unknown): “According to the sensory recruitment model, the direct maintenance of content is then accomplished by posterior regions (Scimeca et al., 2018), specifically those that are involved in the processing of the stimulus in a non-WM context.”