Metapopulation ecology in the sea: from Levins' model to marine ecology and fisheries science

By J. Kritzer, P. Sale. 2004

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79061422f56f01bae72cbcb587f19823898e1a99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Cowen
2. Geoffrey P. Jones
3. S. Sponaugle
4. Robert Steneck
5. G. Almany
6. P. Sale
7. B. Willis
8. J. Kritzer

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Cowen
2. S. Sponaugle
3. Geoffrey P. Jones
4. G. Kornilovs
5. M. Casini
6. C. Möllmann
7. Robert Steneck
8. G. Almany

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of Noncompliance on the Success of Alternative Designs of Marine Protected‐Area Networks for Conservation and Fisheries Management (2004, background): “However, achieving effective transport of offspring from MPAs to fished areas in practice is hampered by a general dearth of information on larval dispersal pathways and the resultant demographic connectivity of marine populations (Russ 2002; Sale 2002; Kritzer & Sale 2004).”
• What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? (2010, background): “…impossible, including plants (Husband & Barrett 1996; Honnay et al. 2005), terrestrial invertebrates (Harrison 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd et al. 1995; Schooley & Wiens 2005), marine invertebrates (Ellien et al. 2000; Foggo et al. 2007), and marine fishes (Man et al. 1995; Kritzer & Sale 2004).”
• Density dependence and population regulation in marine fish: a large‐scale, long‐term field manipulation (2012, background): “In the sea, an added challenge is that most demersal (seafloor-oriented) fish and invertebrate populations exist as ‘‘marine metapopulations,’’ defined as spatially patchy and at least partially demographically open local populations linked by dispersal of larvae (Kritzer and Sale 2004, 2006).”
• Fishing effects on age and spatial structures undermine population stability of fishes (2009, background): “This is essentially the metapopulation concept (Levins 1969, 1970; Kritzer and Sale 2004).”
• Spatial and temporal density dependence regulates the condition of central Baltic Sea clupeids: compelling evidence using an extensive international acoustic survey (2011, positive): “However, as shown by other investigations (e.g., Kritzer and Sale 2004; Hsieh et al. 2008) and the present study, spatial considerations are crucial for understanding fish population dynamics and therefore for the management of exploited stocks.”
• A metapopulation perspective for salmon and other anadromous fish (2007, background): “First, many types of metapopulations can exist without substantial and rapid population turnover (extinctions/recolonizations) (Kritzer and Sale 2004) or without a fraction of the suitable habitats being vacant (see below) (Baguette 2004).”
• Risks of ignoring fish population spatial structure in fisheries management (2011, background): “Many studies suggest that increasingly more marine fish populations should be considered as metapopulations, which are spatially structured and divided into several subpopulations mixing in intermediate levels (Kritzer and Sale 2004).”
• Lessons learned from practical approaches to reconcile mismatches between biological population structure and stock units of marine fish (2017, background): “In more recent years, there has been a shift toward examining questions that are relevant to the temporal scales addressed by fisheries scientists (Kritzer and Sale, 2004).”
• North Sea herring population structure revealed by microsatellite analysis (2005, background): “Over a broader timescale, it is important to note that, as in other clupeoids (Grant & Bowen 1998, Lecomte et al. 2004), herring population dynamics naturally tend to be characterised by marked fluctuations in biomass and recruitment (i.e. ‘boom and bust’) (ICES 2004) that generally reflect natural…”
• Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and management (2005, background): “An alternative approach follows the concept of metapopulation theory from which ABFT would be seen as a collection of discrete local populations, occupying distinct and patchy suitable habitats, displaying their own dynamics but with a degree of demographic influence from other local populations thr”
• Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. (2009, background): “…has been recognized in the value and design of MPA networks (e.g., Crowder et al. 2000, Botsford et al. 2001, Lipcius et al. 2001, Sala et al. 2002, Russ 2002, Hastings & Botsford 2003, Gaines et al. 2003, Halpern & Warner 2003, Kritzer & Sale 2004, Gaylord et al. 2005, Fogarty & Botsford 2007).”
• Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas (2009, background): “Most marine populations are spatially distributed metapopulations (Kritzer and Sale 2004), but their dynamics have been approximated by treating them as single, wellmixed populations (or identical, independent subpopulations).”
• Larval retention and connectivity among populations of corals and reef fishes: history, advances and challenges (2009, background): “Most researchers accept that a full understanding of how coral reef metapopulations work cannot progress until the full extent of larval connectivity is known (Warner and Cowen 2002; Kritzer and Sale 2004, 2006; Sale et al. 2005).”