THE BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERRITORIES OF BIRDS.

By A. Hinde. 2008

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7900b0472c88d6a744fa8b9e2d40d8ac65303695

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. V. van Loon
2. J. Shamoun‐Baranes
3. Willem Bouten
4. K. Camphuysen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Shamoun‐Baranes
2. E. V. van Loon
3. Willem Bouten
4. K. Camphuysen
5. H. Schenk

Citations in the corpus

• Dominance rank influences female space use in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes : towards an ideal despotic distribution (2007, unknown): “While low fidelity might provide individuals with access to different resource patches or lower competitor density, it may also carry substantial costs in terms of foraging efficiency since fidelity affords individuals with access to known resources (Hinde 1956; Greenwood 1980).”
• Sexually distinct foraging strategies in an omnivorous seabird (2015, background): “This could either mean that males spent more time in nest or chick defence than females, or that the presence at the territory is important for males to safeguard their chosen site for future breeding opportunities within the colony (Morse Nice 1941; Hinde 1956).”