Multiple Forms of Value Learning and the Function of Dopamine
By Bernard W. Balleine, Nathaniel D. Daw, John P. O'Doherty. 2009
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78ddc8c05131dc764719cf6c9738dd9213df4570
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Antonio Rangel
- G. E. Wimmer
- Nathaniel D. Daw
- Daphna Shohamy
- Todd A. Hare
- Dylan A. Simon
- John A. Clithero
- John P. O'Doherty
In General Decision Sciences
- Antonio Rangel
- Todd A. Hare
- Nathaniel D. Daw
- Daphna Shohamy
- John A. Clithero
- Robert Sugden
- Douglas Bernheim
- Brian Knutson
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice. (2010, background): “The conditioning theory has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [2,9,18,31], therefore we focus on what is known about the validity of the integration hypothesis.”
- Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans (2012, background): “However, there has been increasing recognition that this narrow mechanism for ‘habit’ learning cannot explain the full diversity of choice behavior, or even the contribution of striatum to it (Balleine et al., 2008; Rangel et al., 2008; Redish et al., 2008).”
- Environmental statistics and the trade-off between model-based and TD learning in humans (2011, background): “There are many suggestions that humans and other animals employ multiple approaches to learned decision making [1].”
- The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy (2009, unknown): “These proposals usually associate the different systems with different regions of the frontal cortex and striatum (Balleine et al., 2009), and raise the additional question of how these multiple valuations interact or combine to control behavior (Daw et al., 2005).”