Hierarchical zooplankton metacommunities: distinguishing between high and limiting dispersal mechanisms
By I. Ng, C. M. Carr, Karl Cottenie. Hydrobiologia, 2009
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78da31ec3907645821d88fd6b1da7cd4ff1d6a58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Environmental Chemistry
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Dormancy and dispersal as mediators of zooplankton population and community dynamics along a hydrological disturbance gradient in inland temporary pools (2017, background): “For instance, it may, via mass effects, affect the recovery rate of temporary pool communities after a series of unsuccessful growing seasons due to early drying (Ng et al., 2009; Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2013).”
- Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities (2012, methodology): “Rarity is a complex concept, and fi nding a useful, objective defi nition of rarity is diffi cult (Rabinowitz 1981, Gaston 1994). An important component of our study was to use diff erent defi nitions of rare and common species matrices and to test whether they infl uence the outcome of ecological h”
- Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “This is because very high or very low dispersal rates may interfere 61 with species sorting, decoupling the otherwise strong relationships between biological 62 communities and local environmental factors (Leibold et al. 2004; Ng et al. 2009; Brown and 63 Swan 2010; Winegardner et al. 2012).”
- Global phylogenetic community structure and β-diversity patterns in surface bacterioplankton metacommunities (2010, background): “…dynamics may indicate a metacommunity with species sorting and either high dispersal (which are true mass effects) or low dispersal between at least some local communities (species sorting and dispersal limitation), although it is difficult to find out which of those is the case (Ng et al. 2009).”
- Environmental and spatial controls of biotic assemblages in a discrete semi‐terrestrial habitat: comparison of organisms with different dispersal abilities sampled in the same plots (2011, background): “Recent metacommunity models (Cottenie, 2005; Ng et al., 2009) integrate niche explanations (i.”