Actually how Empowering is Microcredit

By S. Mahmud. 2003

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78b8e2009f4770fb55ccebac90124da0ca33209b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jan Kratzer
2. M. Kato
3. A. Lakwo

In Gender Studies

1. Jan Kratzer
2. M. Kato
3. A. Lakwo

In Safety Research

1. Jan Kratzer
2. M. Kato
3. A. Lakwo

Citations in the corpus

• Empowering Women through Microfinance: Evidence from Tanzania (2013, background): “Many evaluations of MFIs have shown that microfinance services have a positive impact on women (Hashemi et al., 1996; Khandker, 2005; Lakwo, 2006; Mahmud, 2003; MkNelly & Dunford, 1998, MkNelly & Dunford, 1999; Morduch, 1998; Osmani, 2007; Pitt & Khandker, 1998; Pitt et al., 2006; Pitt et al.,…”
• Microfinance and Climate Change Adaptation (2009, background): “In her study of women’s participation in microcredit programmes in Bangladesh, Mahmud (2003) concludes that while there was a limited direct effect on increasing women’s access to structurally determined ‘choice-enhancing’ resources (i.e. those assets traditionally under male control, such as…”
• Microfinance, rural livelihoods, and women's empowerment in Uganda (2007, methodology): “Other limitations to it include the misspecification of underlying relationships such as due to Hawthorne, invisible attributes, and locational difference (Hulme 1997; Mahmud 2003).”