Humor Types Show Different Patterns of Self-Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Well-Being
By Anja K. Leist, Daniela Müller. 2013
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Humor styles have been found to be associated with well-being, however, no study has addressed the distinct well-being associations of combinations of humor styles, that is, humor types, yet. The present study thus aimed at investigating which combinations of humor styles exist and to which extent these humor types are associated with well-being. In an online questionnaire, the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ, Martin et al. J Res Pers 37:48–75, 2003), self-regulatory strategies, self-esteem, and well-being instruments were administered to a German sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses replicated the underlying structure of the HSQ. With hierarchical clustering, we found evidence for three humor types (endorsers, humor deniers, and self-enhancers), which differed in group means for self-esteem, self-regulatory strategies, and well-being. Findings provide further evidence for the positive well-being correlates of self-enhancing humor, and distinctly address the positive correlates of aggressive and self-defeating humor being absent. It is discussed that humor styles cannot be conceptualized as beneficial or detrimental per se, but have to be regarded in context.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78b711a05a60b5685e3fe74db34b36315528454c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Sense of Humor, Stable Affect, and Psychological Well-Being (2014, background): “Leist and Müller (2013) used cluster analyses to identify ‘humor types’ based on combinations of humor styles.”
- Humour 2.0: Styles and Types of Humour and Virality of Memes on Facebook (2015, background): “…help us understand the effects of different types of humour on the effectiveness of communications, as many scholars have attempted to categorize humour into different types (Cruthirds et al., 2012; Flamson & Barrett, 2013; Kelly & Solomon, 1975; Leist & Müller, 2013; Raskin, 1985; Speck, 1991).”