Prescription vs. praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French

By S. Poplack, Nathalie Dion. 2009

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78b504d1fd3493ec0cfd39db05a80d0bcfba7f99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Lars Hinrichs
2. Suzanne Evans Wagner
3. Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
4. Gillian Sankoff
5. Joan Bresnan
6. Martin J. Pickering
7. Stefan Gries
8. Victor S. Ferreira

In Philosophy

1. Suzanne Evans Wagner
2. Gillian Sankoff

Citations in the corpus

• Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future (2011, methodology): “SUBJECT TYPE thus turned out to be a proxy for formal style in fostering IF, whereas tutoiement versus vouvoiement (our original “address pronoun” category) did not.20 This too is consonant with the findings by Poplack and her colleagues for Ottawa French, but we note that in that study, only vous i”
• Which-hunting and the Standard English relative clause (2015, background): “Inthisspirit, Poplack and Dion (2009) conducted a multivariate study, based on an apparent-time data set spanning 119 years, of constraints on the expression of future temporal reference in spoken French and failed to obtain a match between the normative literature and actual usage patterns.”