A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.
By Else Kristine Breivik, G. Björnsson, E. Skovlund. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 2000
700 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Oral Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78ac9d411ff7cf494eb53a881c681bb797dfc18c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- H. Breivik
- B. Collett
- R. Cohen
- K. Visser
- J. Moen
- José Pais-Ribeiro
- M. A. Ferreira-Valente
- E. Grobbee
Citations in the corpus
- Validity of four pain intensity rating scales (2011, background): “These results are consistent with previous studies that support each scale’s validity [9,10,24,33,44,45], and show that small variations in water temperature result in significant differences in pain intensity ratings [22,40,53,54].”
- Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment (2006, background): “Sixty-six percent were suffering moderate pain when they last experienced pain (i.e. reported a pain score of 5–7 on a 1–10-point NRS scale (Breivik et al., 2000)) and 34% were suffering severe pain (i.e., reported a pain score of 8–10 on a 1–10-point NRS scale (Breivik et al., 2000)) (Fig.”
- Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain (2003, result): “In general there is good agreement between the VAS scale and the 11-point-numeric rating scale (Breivik et al., 2000), although patients and nurses expressed a preference for verbal ratings (Briggs and Closs, 1999).”