Evaluation of the factor structure and construct validity of scores on the Male Role Norms Inventory—Revised (MRNI-R).

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, unknown): “R conducted by Levant et al. (2010), while ensuring that they also captured the construct and avoided redundancy.”
Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. (2015, unknown): “, 2003), and this has been reaffirmed in a number of studies since (see, e.g., Graef, Tokar, & Kaut, 2010; Hammer & Good, 2010; Iwamoto, Liao, & Liu, 2010; Levant et al., 2010; Levant, Wimer, & Williams, 2011; Smiler, 2006a, 2006b; Syzdek & Addis, 2010; Wong, Owen, & Shea, 2012).”
An investigation of masculinity attitudes, gender, and attitudes toward psychological help-seeking (2015, background): “The results of a principal-axis factor analysis support the concept of subscale dimensionality, and evidence was also found for the internal consistency of the MRNI-R total score and seven subscale scores (Levant et al., 2010).”
Toxic Mask-ulinity: The Link between Masculine Toughness and Affective Reactions to Mask Wearing in the COVID-19 Era (2020, methodology): “Our measure of masculinity is taken from the “Toughness” subscale of the Masculine Role Norms Index (Levant et al. 2010), which is composed of five items (full wording appears in the online appendix).”