OVIPOSITION HABITAT SELECTION BY MOSQUITOES (CULISETA LONGIAREOLATA) AND CONSEQUENCES FOR POPULATION SIZE
By M. Spencer, L. Blaustein, Joel E. Cohen. 2002
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78848673d1da47ec97a06df5af1fe301f133d527
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Male-male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus) (2004, background): “Similarly, Spencer et al. (2002) showed that females of Communicated by J. Krause M. Reichard ()) · C. Smith School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK e-mail: reichard@brno.cas.cz Tel.”
- PREDATOR-INDUCED SHIFTS IN MOSQUITO OVIPOSITION SITE SELECTION: A META-ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VECTOR CONTROL (2010, background): “Recent studies specifically highlight that oviposition site selection by mosquitoes can have important consequences for adult populations (Ritchie and Montague, 1995; Spencer et al., 2002) and disease epidemiology (Le Menach et al.”
- Putting Eggs in One Basket: Ecological and Evolutionary Hypotheses for Variation in Oviposition-Site Choice (2010, background): “However, when direct predation risk to females increased, the turtles favored their own survival by nesting closer to the shoreline at the expense of increased predation risk to the nest, supporting the fecundity-survival hypothesis (Spencer 2002).”
- Functional equivalence of non‐lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvae (2003, background): “Incorporating oviposition site selection (habitat selection) into population models affects population size (Holt 1985, Smith et al. 2000, Spencer et al. 2002), growth rate, and persistence (Pulliam and Danielson 1991) as individuals actively avoid population ‘‘sinks’’ while seeking out and…”
- Drought‐induced mosquito outbreaks in wetlands (2003, background): “…have been observed to preferentially oviposit eggs in habitats without predators (Chesson 1984; Petranka & Fakhoury 1991; Angelon & Petranka 2002; Spencer et al. 2002; Kilfawi et al. 2003a); furthermore, some evidence also suggests that mosquitoes can similarly detect and respond to habitats…”
- Larvicidal Efficiency of Aquatic Predators: A Perspective for Mosquito Biocontrol (2006, background): “Mechanisms for predator detection by insects may involve tactile, visual, or chemical cues (Spencer et al. 2002).”
- Oviposition habitat selection for a predator refuge and food source in a mosquito (2005, background): “…insects often avoid ovipositing in sites where there is a high risk of predation to their progeny (Blaustein, 1999; Angelon & Petranka, 2002; Spencer et al., 2002; Kiflawi Correspondence: Trevor Williams, Departamento de Producción Agraria, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona 31006,…”
- Oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata in response to risk of predation and conspecific larval density (2003, background): “Oviposition habitat selection can have significant demographic consequences (Spencer et al., 2002), which may carry over to the community level (Blaustein, 1999).”