Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)

By Christopher A. Fuchs. 2002

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper, I try once again to cause some good-natured trouble. The issue remains, when will we ever stop burdening the taxpayer with conferences devoted to the quantum foundations? The suspicion is expressed that no end will be in sight until a means is found to reduce quantum theory to two or three statements of crisp physical (rather than abstract, axiomatic) significance. In this regard, no tool appears better calibrated for a direct assault than quantum information theory. Far from a strained application of the latest fad to a time-honored problem, this method holds promise precisely because a large part--but not all--of the structure of quantum theory has always concerned information. It is just that the physics community needs reminding. This paper, though taking quant-ph/0106166 as its core, corrects one mistake and offers several observations beyond the previous version. In particular, I identify one element of quantum mechanics that I would not label a subjective term in the theory--it is the integer parameter D traditionally ascribed to a quantum system via its Hilbert-space dimension.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/785c449df7eec1ff86f262c33b377f14fd9f819d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Christopher A. Fuchs
  2. Ruediger Schack
  3. Robert W. Spekkens
  4. A. J. Scott
  5. Lucien Hardy
  6. Alexander I. Lvovsky
  7. Michael G. Raymer
  8. Carlton M. Caves

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Christopher A. Fuchs
  2. Ruediger Schack
  3. A. J. Scott
  4. Robert W. Spekkens
  5. Alexander I. Lvovsky
  6. Lucien Hardy
  7. Gregg Jaeger
  8. Michael G. Raymer

Citations in the corpus