Monitoring nutrient release from fish farms with macroalgal and phytoplankton bioassays

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Growth and reproductive simulation of candidate shellfish species at fish cages in the Southern Mediterranean: Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) modelling for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (2012, background): “…at fish cages in this study is between 0.5 and 1.5 days–1, it is consistent with responses to nutrient enrichment in the Mediterranean, both in open waters close to fish cages (Dalsgaard and Krause-Jensen, 2006; Pitta et al., 2009), as well as during mesocosmal experiments (Duarte et al., 2000).”
Compositional variations of brown seaweeds Laminaria digitata and Saccharina latissima in Danish waters (2017, background): “more sense to evaluate their nutritional status by assessing the tissue N concentrations (Dalsgaard and Krause-Jensen 2006).”
'Ghost nutrients' from fish farms are transferred up the food web by phytoplankton grazers (2009, methodology): “The phytoplankton bioassay described in Dalsgaard & Krause-Jensen (2006) was used in the present study with a small modification to exclude grazers.”