Markov Point Processes and Their Applications
By V. Lieshout. 2000
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Jesper Møller
- Rasmus Waagepetersen
- M. V. Lieshout
- Adrian Baddeley
- Rolf Turner
- B. Vo
- Håvard Rue
- Alex Kulesza
Citations in the corpus
- Determinantal Point Processes for Machine Learning (2012, background): “The Gibbs point process provides such an approach, offering a general framework for incorporating correlations among selected items [Preston, 1976, Ripley and Kelly, 1977, Ripley, 1991, Van Lieshout, 2000, Møller and Waagepetersen, 2004, 2007, Daley and Vere-Jones, 2008].”
- A non-model-based approach to bandwidth selection for kernel estimators of spatial intensity functions (2018, methodology): “Throughout this paper, let be a point process in Rd , d 1, observed within some nonempty open and bounded observation window W ⊆ Rd (Daley & Vere-Jones, 2008; Diggle, 2014; Illian et al., 2008; van Lieshout, 2000).”
- Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion) (2005, methodology): “For Markov point processes (Ripley and Kelly, 1977; van Lieshout, 2000) it is convenient to model X by λ rather than by f , since λ plays the same role as the local characteristics do for Markov random fields when specifying local Markov properties.”
- Generalised shot noise Cox processes (2005, background): “The results in Section 3.2 on reduced Palm distributions and J -functions may, to some extent, be useful for statistical applications [34], [47], [48].”
- Logistic regression for spatial Gibbs point processes (2014, background): “Spatial Gibbs and Markov point processes are important classes of models for spatial depen- 25 dence in point patterns (van Lieshout, 2000) with a broad range of applications (e.g. Harkness & Isham, 1983; Stoyan & Penttinen, 2000; Mattfeldt et al., 2007; Funwi-Gabga & Mateu, 2012).”
- Model-Based Multiple Instance Learning (2017, background): “ributed with mean (A), if A 1;:::;A m ˆXare disjoint (compact) sets, then the random variables N (A 1 );:::;N m are independent. In general the probability density of a point process may not exist [28], [29]. To ensure that probability densities are available, we restrict ourselves to finite point p”
- A J-function for inhomogeneous point processes (2010, neutral): “For further details, see for example [10, 12, 16].”
- Mapping local density of young Eucalyptus plantations by individual tree detection in high spatial resolution satellite images (2013, methodology): “As the reader can find abundant literature on the subject from the mathematical point of view (e.g. Stoyan et al., 1995; van Lieshout, 2000; Jacobsen, 2006), or from an image processing point of view (Descombes, 2012), we present here only the basics of marked point process modeling along with…”
- Determinantal Point Processes (2016, background): “[9], [10], [16], [16], [29], [23], [18] and [32].”
- spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns (2005, background): “…a large body of techniques for analysing spatial point patterns (e.g. Bartlett (1975); Cliff and Ord (1981); Cressie (1991); Diggle (2003); van Lieshout (2000); Mat´ern (1986); Møller and Waagepetersen (2003); Moore (2001); Ripley (1981, 1988); Stoyan, Kendall, and Mecke (1995); Stoyan and…”
- Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory (2009, methodology): “Choosing an appropriate point-process model requires detailed knowledge of available modelling approaches such as those discussed in van Lieshout (2000) and Møller & Waagepetersen (2004).”
- Sequential Monte Carlo methods for multitarget filtering with random finite sets (2005, methodology): “Then vΥ defines a (unitless) measure on the Borel subsets of E, and is called the intensity measure of Υ [8], [43], [44].”
- On Estimation of the Intensity Function of a Point Process (2011, neutral): “Consequently, by the Nguyen–Zessin formula (see e.g. Van Lieshout 2000; Stoyan et al. 1995), To do so, write (cid:2) d − 1 for sets of d − 1 distinct points in (cid:2) .”
- Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * (2007, methodology): “In short, ‘Modern statistics for spatial point processes’, where recent textbooks include Van Lieshout (2000), Diggle (2003), Møller & Waagepetersen (2003b), and Baddeley et al. (2006).”
- The permanental process (2006, background): “…Boson process; Cox process; density of spatial point process; determinantal process; factorial moment measure; fermion process; Gaussian process; infinite divisibility; simulation; spatio-temporal process; weighted permanent 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 60G55 Secondary 62M30”