Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators (2009, background): “…the fixed-effects model.21 This model can be estimated through full MLE and offers considerable advantages over alternative pooling assumptions (see Beck & Katz, 2007).22 We include the measures for human rights abuses both as levels and changes, acknowledging the possibility that short-term…”
The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross‐national variation in commercial microfinance lending (2014, methodology): “Before choosing RCM over panel-data regression, we followed the recommendation of the RCM literature to test the relative strength of the two models (Beck and Katz, 2007; Bliese and Ployhart, 2002; Ployhart and Vandenberg, 2010).”
Modeling Dynamics in Time-SeriesCross-Section Political Economy Data (2011, background): “Another cross-sectional feature that should be considered (see Beck & Katz 2007 and the references cited there) is that parameters may vary randomly by country, and possibly as a function of country-level covariates.”