Context-Related Variation in the Vocal Growling Behaviour of the Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris)

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Size Communication in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) growls. (2010, unknown): “Together, the behaviours defining the second factor (and especially the combination of barking and growling in the same vocal sequence; see Fox 1971; Cohen & Fox 1976; Yin 2002; Taylor et al. 2009) form a typical territorial/guarding response.”
Acoustic analysis of cattle ( Bos taurus ) mother–offspring contact calls from a source–filter theory perspective (2015, background): “Vocal communication can convey different types of information and is thus used in many forms of social inter-actions (Fischer et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2009; Theis et al.,2007).”
The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research (2010, background): “…of the motivation-structural rules and frequency code theory: thus, the barks of domestic dogs recorded in an aggressive context have been found to have a significantly lower F0 than barks recorded in a playful setting (Yin, 2002; Yin & McCowan, 2004; Pongrácz et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 2009).”
Vocal Expression of Emotions in Mammals: Mechanisms of Production and Evidence (2012, background): “…E E Antagonistic and contact vocalizations 1, 2, 5, 15, 16, 22 Yeon et al. (2011) 14 Dog Canis familiaris V E/D E Growls and barks 1, 3, 5, 21, 23 Taylor et al. (2009) 15 A/V E E Barks 1, 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 26 Yin & McCowan (2004) 16 Mongoose Suricat suricatta A E E/O Alarm…”