Sexual coercion in primates and humans : an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females
By Martin N. Muller, R. Wrangham. 2009
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77de788ebafb72f4624eac76d5c3fedcb0c6badd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Health
In Social Psychology
- R. Wrangham
- Martin N. Muller
- Sonya M. Kahlenberg
- M. Emery Thompson
- Brian Hare
- Victoria Wobber
- Michael Tomasello
- John C. Mitani
Citations in the corpus
- Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real (2011, background): “Although universal proceptivity toward the alpha male might ostensibly support a model of female choice for good genes, and the idiosyncratic distribution of proceptivity toward other males could fit with a model of choice for genetic compatibility, additional observations favor the alternative hypo”
- The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression (2012, background): “Male aggression towards females can also be severe and costly for females, partly as a sexually coercive tactic (Muller 2002; Wrangham 2002; Muller et al. 2007; Muller & Wrangham 2009).”