EFFICIENT METHODS IN CONVEX PROGRAMMING
By Arkadi Nemirovski. 2007
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Jakub Konecný
- Peter Richtárik
- Michael I. Jordan
- Francis R. Bach
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Ohad Shamir
- Sergey Levine
- Martin Jaggi
Citations in the corpus
- Trust Region Policy Optimization (2015, background): “With an oracle that gives us subgradients, there are upper bounds on complexity that do not depend on dimensionality d of the underlying space [7].”
- A Survey on Multi-Task Learning (2017, methodology): “[18] employ an optimal first-order optimization method in [19] to solve it.”
- Hybrid Deterministic-Stochastic Methods for Data Fitting (2011, methodology): “Although the O (1 /k 2 ) rate is sub-linear, it is substantially faster than the optimal O (1 / √ k ) achievable by methods that use noisy gradient information [24, § 14.1].”
- Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm (2013, neutral): “Here, the performance of SGD (actually stochastic subgradient decent) depends on the second moment G2 = E[G(2)i ] [12].”
- Learning with Submodular Functions: A Convex Optimization Perspective (2011, methodology): “If the center of the smallest ellipsoid containing the new candidate set is replaced by its center of gravity, then an improved bound holds [167] (with p2 replaced by p in the complexity bound); however, this algorithm is not implemented in practice as there is no known efficient algorithm to find t”
- A Primer on Monotone Operator Methods (2015, background): “By judiciously choosing points to evaluate and accumulating the cutting planes, one can localize a small set in which x⋆ must lie in [29,65,68,73,78,91,92,95,107,108].”
- A Faster Cutting Plane Method and its Implications for Combinatorial and Convex Optimization (2015, unknown): “33”
- Multi-Task Feature Learning Via Efficient l2, 1-Norm Minimization (2009, methodology): “In this paper, we propose to solve the 2,1-norm regularized problem using the first-order black-box methods [14, 16], which evaluate at each iteration the function value and (sub)gradient only.”
- Large-scale sparse logistic regression (2009, methodology): “3.2 The Nemirovski s Line Search Scheme To address the problem that L is usually unknown in advance, Nemirovski [24] proposed a line search scheme for determining Lk (see Algorithm 1).”
- A multi-task learning formulation for predicting disease progression (2011, methodology): “One of the key steps in AGM is the computation of the proximal operator associated with the .2,1-norm regularization.”
- Information-theoretic lower bounds on the oracle complexity of convex optimization (2009, methodology): “In addition to the original text NY [4], we refer the reader to the book by Nesterov [3], and the lecture notes by Nemirovski [5] for background.”
- Integrating low-rank and group-sparse structures for robust multi-task learning (2011, methodology): “5.4 Numerical Studies on APM We conduct numerical studies on APM in comparison with PM for solving RMTL in terms of the computation time (in seconds) and the iteration number.”
- Adaptive Restart for Accelerated Gradient Schemes (2012, background): “For strongly convex functions an alternative to choosing the optimal value of q in Algorithm 1 is to use restarting, [3, 11, 15, 16, 20].”
- On Similarity Preserving Feature Selection (2013, methodology): “By using the Nesterov’s method in constrained optimization [25], [26], [27], the second one globally solves the constrained optimization problem and selects features accordingly.”
- On the Oracle Complexity of First-Order and Derivative-Free Algorithms for Smooth Nonconvex Minimization (2012, methodology): “Worst-case complexity analysis for optimization methods probably really started with Nemirovski and Yudin (1983), where the notion of oracle (or black-box) complexity was introduced.”
- Lower bounds for finding stationary points I (2017, result): “While essentially present in previous work, our technique abstracts away and generalizes the central arguments in many lower bounds [35, 34, 45, 4].”
- Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds on the Oracle Complexity of Stochastic Convex Optimization (2010, methodology): “C.1 Background on mirror descent Mirror descent is a generalization of (projected) stochastic gradient descent, first introduced by Nemirovski and Yudin [5]; here we follow a more recent presentation of it due to Beck and Teboulle [23].”