Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel

By D. Devries, C. Grimes, M. Prager. 2002

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77b5cea65fc64a963f502d721d4d7be7c0816e94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris (2010, methodology): “slopes were equal across sites the variable was standardized for size by subtracting the product of otolith length and the common within-group slope (Reist 1985; Turan 2000; DeVries et al. 2002; Tuset et al. 2006).”
Discriminant function analysis in marine ecology: some oversights and their solutions (2007, unknown): “Maximum likelihood methods are commonly used in the otolith literature to supplement inferences from DFA (Campana et al. 1999, 2000, Thorrold et al. 2001, Gillanders 2002, Wells et al. 2003).”
Otolith shape and temporal stability of spawning groups of Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.) (2006, background): “, 1986), king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla; DeVries et al., 2002), and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus; Begg and Brown, 2000).”
Classification of time series by shapelet transformation (2013, background): “Analysis of otolith boundaries may allow estimation of stock composition, including whether the samples are from one stock or multiple stocks Campana and Casselman (1993), De Vries et al. (2002), DuarteNeto et al. (2008), allowing management decisions to be made Stransky (2005).”
Otolith shape analysis: its application for discriminating between stocks of Irish Sea and Celtic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea (2008, methodology): “ified, size effects can be corrected for using the common within-group slope (Reist, 1985; Begg et al., 2001; DeVries et al., 2002; Galley et al., 2006).”
Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags (2007, methodology): “Similar statistical methods have been used to understand stock structure and composition for fisheries applications and assume that the sampled population is representative of the fishery (Pella and © 2007 NRC Canada Robertson 1979; DeVries et al. 2002; Fabrizio 2005).”
Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis (2007, background): “Moreover, the otolith shape depends on the biological and ecological behaviour of the species (Lombarte and Lleonart 1993; Panfili et al. 2002; Cardinale et al. 2004) and may be associated with differences in food and spatio-temporal niches (Aguirre and Lombarte 1999; De Vries et al. 2002 ).”