A call for an end to calls for the end of invasion biology

By Daniel Simberloff, J. Vitule. 2014

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77b3c6795726c412ff88d5817c37a500f37a78e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. A. Gutierrez
2. A. Escudero
3. L. Kats
4. Harini Nagendra
5. Carlo Ricotta
6. Kate S. He
7. Duccio Rocchini
8. Markus Neteler

In Ecology

1. Markus Metz
2. S. Thomaz
3. L. Kats
4. K. Kovalenko
5. S. Amalfitano
6. A. Gutierrez
7. A. Escudero
8. Harini Nagendra

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Escudero
2. L. Kats
3. Harini Nagendra
4. Carlo Ricotta
5. Kate S. He
6. Duccio Rocchini
7. Markus Neteler
8. J. Havel

Citations in the corpus

• Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future (2015, background): “Countering this idea, Simberloff & Vitule (2014) provide compelling argument that invasive species are fundamentally different from most natives.”
• The historical reference in restoration ecology: Re-defining a cornerstone concept (2014, background): “Much has been written about this issue (e.g., Simberloff and Vitule, 2014), and we will not address it in detail here.”
• Potential of remote sensing to predict species invasions (2015, background): “One of the crucial steps in evaluating the impact of invasive species is to map changes in their actual and potential distribution and relative abundance across a wide region over an appropriate time span.”