“Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content

By Maria D. Molina, Shyam Sundar, Thai Le, Dongwon Lee. American Behavioral Scientist, 2019

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

As the scourge of “fake news” continues to plague our information environment, attention has turned toward devising automated solutions for detecting problematic online content. But, in order to build reliable algorithms for flagging “fake news,” we will need to go beyond broad definitions of the concept and identify distinguishing features that are specific enough for machine learning. With this objective in mind, we conducted an explication of “fake news” that, as a concept, has ballooned to include more than simply false information, with partisans weaponizing it to cast aspersions on the veracity of claims made by those who are politically opposed to them. We identify seven different types of online content under the label of “fake news” (false news, polarized content, satire, misreporting, commentary, persuasive information, and citizen journalism) and contrast them with “real news” by introducing a taxonomy of operational indicators in four domains—message, source, structure, and network—that together can help disambiguate the nature of online news content.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77977b9fdf012c3262755f058df43a3634eed472

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted
  2. Jieun Shin

In Communication

  1. Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted
  2. Sabrine Amri
  3. Esma Aïmeur
  4. Gilles Brassard
  5. Jieun Shin

Citations in the corpus