An algorithm for shakedown analysis with nonlinear yield functions
By N. Zouain, L. Borges, J. L. Silveira. 2002
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7770e3620ea1d8d17b71d1e83ac0b3c891ce9e4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
- Hung Nguyen-Xuan
- C. Martin
- Timon Rabczuk
- Javier Bonet
- Jaime Peraire
- L. Leonetti
- Trung Nguyen-Thoi
- Jaan-Willem Simon
In Mechanics of Materials
- Hung Nguyen-Xuan
- Timon Rabczuk
- Trung Nguyen-Thoi
- N. Nguyen‐Thanh
- Guirong Liu
- Stéphane P.A. Bordas
- Trung Nghia Tran
- L. Leonetti
Citations in the corpus
- Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second‐order cone programming (2007, methodology): “[20], so their refinement seems to be targeted correctly.”
- A unified mathematical programming formulation of strain driven and interior point algorithms for shakedown and limit analysis (2011, methodology): “Square plate with a central circular hole The first test is the classic plate subject to the biaxial uniform loads p1 and p2 (see Figure 2 and Table II) considered in numerical shakedown analysis [26, 41, 42].”
- Second-Order Cone and Semidefinite Representations of Material Failure Criteria (2007, methodology): “Some recent methods, based on interior-point methods (IPMs), treat wide classes of criteria [33, 34].”
- Numerical lower bound shakedown analysis of engineering structures (2011, unknown): “[26–34].”
- Computation of limit and shakedown loads using a node‐based smoothed finite element method (2012, methodology): “From these results, it can be observed that all numerical limit load factors converge to the exact one and NS-FEM can produce more accurate solutions than FEM, mixed model [66], and ES-FEM.”
- An interior‐point algorithm for elastoplasticity (2007, background): “for plastic limit and shakedown analysis [58–62] where it appears to furnish excellent results.”
- Shakedown analysis of engineering structures with limited kinematical hardening (2012, methodology): “Since not all problems can be formulated as SOCP and for efficiency reasons, alternative algorithms have been presented (Zouain et al., 2002; Lyamin and Sloan, 2002; Krabbenhøft and Damkilde, 2003; Vu et al., 2004; Akoa et al., 2007; Krabbenhøft et al., 2007c; Vu and Staat, 2007; Pastor et al., 2008”
- Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive‐frictional materials using second‐order cone programming (2006, methodology): “All of the numerical examples in References [21, 29, 30] were confined to the von Mises criterion, and it seems that the substantial modifications by Pontes et al.”
- Upper and lower bounds in limit analysis: Adaptive meshing strategies and discontinuous loading (2009, methodology): “[24] using a mixed element for shakedown analysis.”