Value-chain Agriculture and Debt Relations: contradictory outcomes

By P. McMichael. 2013

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77531055b0c92026df0bde0e197be1a0518c9046

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Marion Werner
2. Sarah Rotz
3. V. Fernández
4. Sarah J. Martin
5. Evan D. G. Fraser
6. J. Clapp
7. Jennifer Bair
8. Henry S. C. Yeung

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Sarah Rotz
2. Sarah J. Martin
3. Evan D. G. Fraser
4. J. Clapp

Citations in the corpus

• Linking Up to Development? Global Value Chains and the Making of a Post-Washington Consensus (2014, background): “For critical analysis of the value chain turn in agriculture, see McMichael (2013) and Neilson”
• Finance for agriculture or agriculture for finance (2015, background): “Agrifood scholars often place this expansion within the realm of capitalist relations, and as an expression Clapp/Martin JAC Submission 2 of the contemporary food regime, which highlights the contradictions and logic of capital (e.g. Burch and Lawrence 2009; McMichael 2013).”
• Resilience and the industrial food system: analyzing the impacts of agricultural industrialization on food system vulnerability (2015, background): “There are many factors that have led to declining diversity, and both Keynesian and neoliberal agricultural policy seem to have—in their own ways—led to a decline in diversity (McMichael 2013).”